<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Kindle, Nook, and New Year&#8217;s Resolutions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.craigdthomas.com/2010/01/the-kindle-nook-and-new-years-resolutions.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.craigdthomas.com/2010/01/the-kindle-nook-and-new-years-resolutions.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 10:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig T.</title>
		<link>http://blog.craigdthomas.com/2010/01/the-kindle-nook-and-new-years-resolutions.php/comment-page-1#comment-29594</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.craigdthomas.com/?p=864#comment-29594</guid>
		<description>Thanks for stopping by the blog and posting a comment.

I agree that the Nook looks a little bit prettier than the Kindle, but the Kindle just seems to have the kinks worked out.  The touchscreen was flaky at best and unusable at worst on the Nook.  However, the biggest thing that pushed me over the edge was the fact that the Kindle had more &quot;real&quot; books.  I did a random sampling of books I either have or will be buying and the Kindle had ALL of them, while the Nook only had abou 80%-85% of them.

Enjoy your Nook, and here&#039;s to a hope that the e-book technology and selection will continue to grow and improve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for stopping by the blog and posting a comment.</p>
<p>I agree that the Nook looks a little bit prettier than the Kindle, but the Kindle just seems to have the kinks worked out.  The touchscreen was flaky at best and unusable at worst on the Nook.  However, the biggest thing that pushed me over the edge was the fact that the Kindle had more &#8220;real&#8221; books.  I did a random sampling of books I either have or will be buying and the Kindle had ALL of them, while the Nook only had abou 80%-85% of them.</p>
<p>Enjoy your Nook, and here&#8217;s to a hope that the e-book technology and selection will continue to grow and improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Poulin</title>
		<link>http://blog.craigdthomas.com/2010/01/the-kindle-nook-and-new-years-resolutions.php/comment-page-1#comment-29592</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Poulin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.craigdthomas.com/?p=864#comment-29592</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you love your Kindle; I myself chose the Nook and am equally enamored of it. I went with it because it&#039;s aesthetics is more pleasing to me. The Kindle isn&#039;t ugly but would be considered the step-sister to the Nook&#039;s Cinderella.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you love your Kindle; I myself chose the Nook and am equally enamored of it. I went with it because it&#8217;s aesthetics is more pleasing to me. The Kindle isn&#8217;t ugly but would be considered the step-sister to the Nook&#8217;s Cinderella.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

